新站点大量怼AI文章，SEO会出现什么效果？

We recently launched a B-side site that had over 100 articles in less than a month.
我们最近搞了一个B端站点，一上线不到一个月就怼了100多篇文章。

Because our focus is actually not the ranking of these content, but the ranking of the service page, just want to assist the promotion of the service page through the long tail words of a large number of articles.
因为我们的重点其实不在这些内容的排名，而是服务页面的排名，只是想通过大量文章的长尾词出词来去辅助服务页面的提升。

In addition, because of the silo structure, these blogs are supporting pages.
此外，还因为silo structure的关系，让这些博客做supporting page.

Originally, the data were all good, and many words with high CPC value were ranked, when I thought this strategy was work, and then less than a month...
本来数据一切相好，有很多CPC价值很高的词都出排名了，当我以为这个策略是work的时候，然后不到一个月...

Boom!
Boom！

The deep fryer!
炸锅了！

The inclusion of AI articles has continued to fall, and almost 80% of AI articles have been killed.
AI文章的收录就持续的下跌，几乎80%以上的AI文章都被干掉了。

After this trial, or lesson.
经过这次试验，或者说教训后。

I don't use the so-called AI detection tools anymore.
我现在基本不用所谓的AI检测工具了。

One of the things that made me laugh was this comment on YouTube:
让我觉得挺搞笑的一句话，就是在油管里面有个评论：

"use ai to trick AI, and thinking that' content is not ai", that is, they are using AI to detect AI, and then trying to deceive themselves that this is not an AI article, which is not what China says!
“use ai to trick ai， and thinking that' content is not ai”，就是自己都在用AI来检测AI，然后试图骗自己这不是AI文章，这不是中国所说的掩耳盗铃么！

These AI articles are now basically included in the crawl but not indexed sequence, and it is difficult to enter this sequence.
这些AI文章现在基本都是被列入crawl but not indexed序列，进入到这个序列的话基本要收录很难了。

He was not at all the same as he was discovered not indexed.
他和discovered not indexed完全不一样。

There are also people trying to use one URL at a time to submit, and indeed some can still be included, but it will not take long to be included.
也有人尝试去用逐个URL提交，确实有些还是可以被收录，但不用多久收录还是会被干掉。

If you want to solve it, you should start from several points:
要想解决，那就应该从几个点入手：

1. Optimize the article;
1. 优化文章；

2. Use the new URL;
2. 用新URL；

3. Eliminate old article links to avoid affecting the crawler's judgment of your website and wasting the crawling budget;
3. 干掉旧文章链接，避免影响爬虫对你网站的判断及浪费爬取预算；

So our core now is to emphasize the context of the article logic and readability!
于是我们现在的核心是强调文章的上下文逻辑和可读性！

Many people seem to be happy with the content generated by chatgpt, the structure of the article, but when you translate it with deepl, you will find that each sentence looks fine, but the connection is very stiff.
很多人对chatgpt生成的内容，文章的结构看似都很满意，但是用deepl翻译过来你就会发现，每句话看起来都没毛病，但是连在一起就很生硬。

If this passes gtpzero.me, it doesn't pass google bert.
这个就算能过gtpzero.me，也过不了google bert算法。

Google has been working on NLP natural language programs for a very long time, and using AI to write articles that want to fool Google is really teaching an axe.
Google在NLP自然语言程序上的研究已经非常长时间了，用AI写文章想要欺骗Google真的是在班门弄斧。

Therefore, we are now writing articles to emphasize that AI is only auxiliary, and we should pay more attention to the context.
所以我们现在写文章强调的是AI只是辅助，更应该注重上下文的关联。

Therefore, we will basically rewrite on the basis of AI articles to ensure the readability of article context.
所以我们基本都会在AI文章的基础上做rewrite一遍，以确保文章上下文的可读性。

This is the same as doing SEO.
这个和做SEO是一样道理。

No matter how fancy your technology, if you don't focus on solving problems for searchers, you're not going to get good results.
不论你技术多么花俏，一旦你没有围绕为搜索者解决问题为核心去做排名，就肯定不会有好结果。

Writing articles is the same, google emphasizes "helpful content", rather than excluding AI, and using AI to write "helpful content" can also get a good ranking.
写文章也是一样，google强调的是“helpful content”，而并非排斥AI，用AI写出“helpful content”也一样可以获得很好的排名。

It's like an e-commerce project we were working on, and our staff wrote an article "best...."
就好像我们在做的一个电商项目，我们的员工写了一篇“best....”

", a list of more than a dozen categories of content, and are all rewritten with chatgpt, but the ranking is very high, because such articles Google found helpful.
的文章，把十几个品类的内容做了罗列解释，并且都是用chatgpt进行重写的，但排名非常靠前，因为这样的文章Google觉得是helpful的。

Chatgpt is now a double-edged sword, used well as an efficiency weapon and used badly as a deadly tool.
Chatgpt现在就是个双刃剑，用的好是效率提升的武器，用的不好就是致命工具。

I will continue to test our new strategy and let you know the progress when it works
回头我会继续测试我们的新策略，有效果再和大家说下进展情况～